LEAKED VIDEO: Google Leadership Dismayed Reaction to Trump Election

A video recorded by Google shortly after the 2016 presidential election reveals an atmosphere of panic and dismay amongst the tech giant’s leadership, coupled with a determination to thwart both the Trump agenda and the broader populist movement emerging around the globe.

The video is a full recording of Google’s first all-hands meeting following the 2016 election (these weekly meetings are known inside the company as “TGIF” or “Thank God It’s Friday” meetings). Sent to Breitbart News by an anonymous source, it features co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, VPs Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton, CFO Ruth Porat, and CEO Sundar Pichai. It can be watched in full above. It can and should be watched in full above in order to get the full context of the meeting and the statements made.

It was reported earlier this week that Google tried to boost turnout among the Latino population to help Hillary Clinton, only to be dismayed as the usually solid Democratic voting bloc switched to the GOP in record numbers. This video shows a similar level of dismay among Google’s most high-profile figures.

These individuals, who preside over a company with unrivaled influence over the flow of information, can be seen disparaging the motivations of Trump voters and plotting ways to use their vast resources to thwart the Trump agenda.

Co-founder Sergey Brin can be heard comparing Trump supporters to fascists and extremists. Brin argues that like other extremists, Trump voters were motivated by “boredom,” which he says in the past led to fascism and communism.

The Google co-founder then asks his company to consider what it can do to ensure a “better quality of governance and decision-making.”

VP for Global Affairs Kent Walker argues that supporters of populist causes like the Trump campaign are motivated by “fear, xenophobia, hatred, and a desire for answers that may or may not be there.”

Later, Walker says that Google should fight to ensure the populist movement – not just in the U.S. but around the world – is merely a “blip” and a “hiccup” in a historical arc that “bends toward progress.”

CEO Sundar Pichai states that the company will develop machine learning and A.I. to combat what an employee described as “misinformation” shared by “low-information voters.”

Key moments from the video can be found at the following timestamps:

Update — After Breitbart News published this article, a Google spokesperson replied to a request for comment with the following statement:

“At a regularly scheduled all hands meeting, some Google employees and executives expressed their own personal views in the aftermath of a long and divisive election season. For over 20 years, everyone at Google has been able to freely express their opinions at these meetings. Nothing was said at that meeting, or any other meeting, to suggest that any political bias ever influences the way we build or operate our products. To the contrary, our products are built for everyone, and we design them with extraordinary care to be a trustworthy source of information for everyone, without regard to political viewpoint.”

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. You can follow him on TwitterGab.ai and add him on Facebook. Email tips and suggestions to allumbokhari@protonmail.com.



WHAT HAS GOOGLE (ALPHABET, YOUTUBE, IN-QTEL, CALICO and the hundreds of Google facades) DONE WRONG?


"...Google is a criminal organization that bribes politicians; spies on the public for political manipulation; supports racism, misogyny, sex deviance and prostitutes among its staff; operates cult procedures in it's HR program; operates tax evasion and real estate money laundering schemes; is one of the largest 'Dark Money' covert crony campaign financiers the world; manipulates stock market and public news information; sells fake traffic to advertisers and engages in numerous white collar crimes..."


"...Larry Page (and his boyfriend Elon Musk), Eric Schmidt, Jared Cohen, Sergey Brin and their venture capitalists are sick sociopaths. They do not care what you, the FBI, Congress or any version of the law thinks about them. They process ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS A DAY through their accounting departments. They can afford any gay sex rent boy or dominatrix prostitute any time they want one. They can buy an entire commercial jet on their credit card. They own almost every senator in California. They do not care what you, or anyone on Earth thinks about them. They only care about cash and power. They plot and conspire to control the government, news and information in order to keep that cash and power. They use CIA, Stasi and Masison Avenue mind tricks to do their dirty deeds in plain sight using technologies that no average citizen can comprehend!..."


Google has more power than the EU or the U.S. Government and, essentially, operates as it's own monopolistic out-of-control rogue government within domestic borders.

Issues with Google Include:

- While Facebook has consumed recent information manipulation scandal head-lines, the illicit activities behind Google make Facebook pale in comparison.

- Tens of thousands of news articles and federal reports confirm that Google receives a very large sum of assets and cash from the intelligence community monthly.

- While Google pitched the government on Google’s ability to ‘help catch bad guys’, that is, in fact not what Google is doing with the money. Almost every attempt to use Google technology at the CIA, DIA and NSA has resulted in either 1.) spectacular failure or 2.) wild goose chases.

- Google operates one of the largest ‘Pass-Along Payola’ scams ever deployed. In this scam 1.) Taxpayer money from The Treasury is, 2.) ...Given to crony corruption insider Google, 3.) ...Who then conduits the money, as covert campaign funds, to the corrupt political officials who got Google the government deals in the first place.

- The Google Pass-Along Payola scam is endless, getting bigger and requires Congressional action to break the chain.

- Google has paid off SEC, CFTC , FCC and FTC officials for protection.

- There are over 100 ex-Google employees and deeply credentialed experts who can testify to these facts but they have been blockaded, by Google lobbyists and dirty politicians, from public testimony.

- For example, Dr. Robert Epstein, James Damore, Ronald Robertson, Laura Ingraham and a host of others, have publicly offered hard facts proving the assertions herein but they have never been interviewed by Congressional staff in an office not under surveillance or in a live televised Congressional hearing. A full disclosure of what these ‘over 100’ people know would put Google out-of-business rather quickly.

- Google pitched government officials about their ability to ‘...start and operate a political revolution in any venue, domestic or overseas, cause members of the public to become angry enough to kill targeted other members of the public and create and operate these effects in an undetectable manner using subliminal psychological manipulation tricks amplified by Google’s control of the internet connected to the mass population...’. This means that Google has admitted to rigging elections and politics.

- While that service premise may cause concern at first read, what should cause even more concern are the dossiers and psychological profiles of Google’s Eric Schmidt, Larry Page, Jared Cohen, and Sergy Brin. Their deeply emotional involvement in their shared personal politics combined with their utter disregard for the law makes one wonder about how far they will go in their ‘means justifies the ends’ cult like devotion to ‘The Google Process’.

- With an extremist culture, filtered HR programs that seek 'like minded employees', a willingness to discuss the need for "coup d-eta's, an endless supply of government cash and an ownership bent on total political control of their singular ideology, should this not cause concern?'

- Google used these tactics and technologies to place Barack Obama in the White House. That is why the Obama White House was so deeply staffed by Google employees and executives. Senior FBI and CIA officials, like Comey and Brennan, knew of this and covered it up.

- If you look on PACER.GOV you will see that Google has an extraordinary number of lawsuits filed against it for stealing the technology of others. Many of these lawsuits refer to Google as a racketeering "cartel'. Google has no concern for the law, business ethics or the rights of others. The Google cartel owns hundreds of front operations disguised under different high tech names.

- 90% of the employees at Google are oblivious to, and hidden from, the machinations of Google’s owners. They are solicited by the cult of Google with free food, ‘coolness’, gadgets and a programmed echo-chamber cult-like HR process which requires ‘mindfulness training’ and ‘Community organizing’ outreach. Google is more Rajneesh and Scientology than they are science. The DOJ Cult Intervention Team should be deeply examining the abuse of young Millennial Google employees

- The most critically important point and the key take-away here is this: Google bosses have built a system to subliminally control the impressions of the public, spy on the public for political control and operate a self-sustaining government payola scam and they do this with impunity, zero monitoring and in one of the grossest violations of morality and human rights ever conceived.

- The next most critical take-away here is: If you are an average person, it is technically nearly impossible for you to comprehend or notice what the crimes are that Google is doing. That is the magic of their scheme.


On the topic of 
privacy, Dr. Robert Epstein has produced research that shows that Internet users are divulging nearly 40 percent more personal information online than they would if knew more about how that information might be used. He and collaborator Ronald Robertson have found that the typical "Terms of Service" (TOS) warning has no impact on behavior and therefore is useless as a warning. Adding a requirement that people click to acknowledge the TOS message creates a deterrent effect; adding a strong, explicit warning to the TOS message increases the effectiveness of the deterrent.

Regarding elections, Epstein and Robertson have found in multiple studies that search rankings that favor a political candidate drive the votes of undecided voters toward that candidate, an effect they call SEME ("seem"), the Search Engine Manipulation Effect. As a result, Dr. Epstein has called for the regulation and monitoring of search engines. Without equal-time rules of the sort that protect political candidates in other media domains, he says, biased search rankings exercise undue influence over voter's opinions - influence that cannot be counteracted by individual candidates but that can easily determine who will win a close election. 

Epstein and Robertson's la ndmark report about SEME, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in 2015, can be downloaded here. As of January 2018, it had been downloaded more than 90,000 times from PNAS's website and was ranked by PNAS to be in the top 1 percent of all reports the organization monitored in all the sciences.

Dr. Epstein's Politico essay, "How Google Could Rig the 2016 Election," can be downloaded here. Dr. Epstein's preview of his upcoming book, "The New Mind Control," published in Aeon magazine - which has been viewed more than 250,000 times - can be downloaded here.

To view Dr. Epstein talking about SEME on the Larry King Show, click here. To view a comedy sketch about SEME on the RT network, click here.

Dr. Epstein also recently discovered a simple yet powerful way that search suggestions can be used to shift opinions and votes, an effect he calls the Search Suggestion Effect (SSE). An initial report about his research on this topic can be viewed here.

In a series of articles in distinguished publications - "
Google's Dance" (TIME), "Google's Gotcha" (U.S. News & World Report), "Google's Snoops" (Dissent), "The New Censorship" (U.S. News & World Report), and other essays - Dr. Epstein has also been critical of various aspects of the operations and business model of Google, Inc., which he says pose a serious threat to civil liberties.